Kelty Redwing 44 vs Osprey Porter 46

In this article, we will compare Kelty Redwing 44 vs Osprey Porter 46. These two nice backpacks are both quite versatile. They are usable for traveling, trekking, and hiking. They have nearly similar sizes and capacities. So, which one has the better value for the money? Continue reading below!

In terms of design, Kelty Redwing 44 has the better edge. It has a nice, good-looking design that is both comfortable and efficient. On the front side, you can find a dual-zippered compartment that is handy for storing smaller items. Meanwhile, the primary compartment has a U-shaped zipper that allows easy and convenient organization. But the thing that makes Kelty Redwing 44 better than Osprey Porter 46 is the design of the compression straps. Kelty’s compression straps do not block any of the zippers! So, you will not have to release the straps every time you want to open a zipper.

We have discussed about the Porter series in Osprey Ozone vs Porter. Osprey Porter 46’s StraightJacket compression straps offer a love-hate relationship. These padded compression straps are actually very effective for compression the bag when it is not fully loaded. They are also very effective for keeping the load stable. However, the straps cover the front zipper, and the side pads cover the primary zippers! In other words, you will have to open the straps every time you need to take something out from any zipper. Not convenient.

Kelty Redwing 44 is actually bigger overall, as the total dimensions are 25 inches x 15 inches x 12 inches. However, it is lighter at 2 lbs 10 oz. The lighter design is achieved by combining the Poly 420D main fabric with the Poly 75x150D reinforcement fabric. In addition, it uses a lightweight aluminum-HDPE frame. The total capacity is 44 liters.

On the other hand, Osprey Porter 46 offers a more compact size, but the weight is heavier. It measures 22 inches x 14 inches x 11 inches, and weighs 3.4 lbs. This is because it uses thicker, heavier fabrics. The main fabric is 420HD Nylon Packcloth, whereas the reinforcement fabric is 420D Nylon Wave Ripstop. While the whole thing is indeed more durable, Osprey Porter 46 uses a 1mm HDPE framesheet. Without a solid aluminum frame, the bag may lack some structural integrity.

Additional Features
Now, let’s see the additional features available on Kelty Redwing 44 vs Osprey Porter 46. Generally speaking, one can say that Kelty Redwing 44 is geared more towards trekking and hiking, whereas Osprey Porter 46 for traveling.

Kelty Redwing 44 has dual side pockets, which are very useful for items that require quick access. There are several pockets for organization, a sleeve for a hydration pack or laptop, axe/pole loops, and a hide-away daisy chain. There are removable waist belt and sternum strap.

On the other hand, Osprey Porter 46 has a zippered top pocket for small items such as toiletries, snack bars, or liquids. The front panel is designed primarily for books and documents, and there are several organization pockets as well. The zips are lockable for security while traveling. There is a stowaway padded hip belt to help stabilize a heavy load.

Kelty Redwing 44 vs Osprey Porter 46

- Polyester
- Imported
- Multi-purpose backpack
- Product Dimensions: 22"H x 14"W x 9"D
- Large, panel load lockable zippered access
- Foam padded sidewalls with StraightJacket

Especially for trekking and hiking, Kelty Redwing 44 is a better choice. It has a more convenient design. You can access the compartments without having to release the compression straps. It has a handful of pockets for easy organization, and an aluminum frame for structural integrity and weight distribution. However, Osprey Porter 46 is a viable alternative for traveling, if you need the lockable zippers.